#Police and #SocialMedia

I came across the following at the BSC Policing Network and thought it worthy of distribution. The article argues for the undoubted value of social media in police context however; to do the thing ‘correctly’ requires a little more than simply diving in!

Police use of social media: Empirical research is necessary – http://wp.me/p2PT5F-8j

#PCC2016 – Policing and Public Impacts?

In 2012 I questioned the overall value of the Police and Crime Commissioner’s role in UK policing. I wrote on the YorkMix… “Many questions regarding the Police and Crime Commissioner elections still remain, a few days before the vote. Will we see any solid advantages realised in the policing of our society” – (read more).

You’ll note from my original piece that I wasn’t that enamoured with our Government’s PCC raison d’être – a political pipe dream of blame shifting for service delivery failures – let alone any perceived policing ‘values’ for the communities at the receiving end of that service.

Lauded as “the biggest shake-up of policing for almost 50 years” the 2012 elections were (by any standards) an electoral disaster. The average turnout was below 15% and that figure dropped even lower to 10.4% for a 2014 West Midlands PCC by-election. So, with the lowest turnout of electors in peacetime Britain then, is it likely there will be any tangible difference this time around?

Over the last four years there has been considerable expenditure of public money on the role of PCC but has any of that actually been money well spent? Have those who were elected in the past, managed to change the public view of the PCC role? Have the public changed their opinion about the relevance or perceived importance of the role in policing of their community, or our society as a whole? In short, what’s really any different this time around?

The North Yorkshire PCC candidates (below) have started campaigning in earnest (all be it a little late), but as far as I can see, attendance at the hustings doesn’t bode well for the future election turnout. I wouldn’t be surprised if the limited mandate achieved previously was very similar this time around. If anything, the last four years has probably served to create even greater levels of disinterest, along with distrust in some areas, than was previously the case.

  • James Blanchard (Liberal Democrat): “I want to be a different kind of Police and Crime Commissioner – listening to and available for local residents.”
  • Stephen Howley (Labour Party): “I am not just the Labour candidate, I am the voice from the frontline someone who will genuinely fight for your frontline emergency services.”
  • Julia Mulligan (Conservative Party): “Policing is changing. The next 4 years will be vital and we need an experienced PCC with a record of fighting North Yorkshire’s corner, as well as delivering improvements locally.”
  • Mike Pannett (Independent): “…only I can provide the service you deserve, free from political spin and partisan agenda.”

The one person who had a prime opportunity to change any negativity in public perceptions was the current post incumbent. This factor has been evident in many areas across England and Wales, not just locally. Of even greater relevance in this second election is the sad fact; the words and deeds of many have actually served to foster or bolster greater levels of public disillusionment / distrust about the role of PCC.

Too many have been embroiled in high-profile wrangling over personal, political and financial discrepancies. Skeletons have fallen from cupboards with alarming regularity and it would appear continue to do so. Any specific achievements in policing delivery, which in reality are few and far between, have mostly been overshadowed in the stench of a media fuelled public opinion dung heap. What the PCC may have done to improve policing in any area of the UK has become almost irrelevant. The electorate (public and police) remains unconvinced about what if anything a PCC can do to change policing for the better.

From what I’ve seen in both mainstream and social media, it would appear very few in the PCC ‘game’ have actually stepped up to the mark so far. Too few have actually devoted effort into much more than self-promotion. Some weren’t there for the right reasons in the first place. Some were simply looking for a convenient back-door entry into politics. Far too few have put sufficient effort into the marketing and promotion of their role (as opposed to themselves), to provide greater public understanding and trust. This has also been woefully evident locally.

The quality of ‘service delivery’ we actually get from our police is actually down to those on the front line of that service. But, as with other emergency services and the NHS, or any other public service for that matter, ‘quality’ is too often impeded and/or stifled by inept / inappropriate, politically motivated and self-promotional management constraints.

With the factor of ‘service delivery’ firmly in mind, I found an interesting read from fellow blogger (Cate Moore), all be it mostly relevant to the Lincolnshire PCC election.

As a member of the Labour Party, I thought I would simply vote for the Labour candidate but when I actually looked at the candidates and evaluated their worth to Policing and the wider PCC remit… I am well aware of the irony of me supporting a Conservative candidate but I can cope with that, to get someone in to a position where I think they can really make a difference and after all, that’s what Public Service is all about. (Read More)

In reality, the PCC role is actually part of our current national political structures, and indeed the predominant corporate bullshit of our business world in that; we are consistently being shafted by self-interest and hot air sound bites from self-promoting individuals who dress their words up as genuine concern for our society… It’s simply a contrived ‘scam’ of public appeasement and nothing much has changed since 2012.

Note: Elections for police and crime commissioners will take place across most of England and Wales on 5 May 2016. For those who don’t know what all this is about, there is a BBC guide that provides information about; what PCCs are supposed to do and how the system is supposed to work (see here).

Don’t bother me with your religion!

Nelson MandelaTo paraphrase a quote from Nelson Mandela… Babies aren’t born hating, as adults we actually teach our children to do that. Go and add a liberal dose of religion to the mix and we have some massive, often dangerous social issues blighting our world.

I’m certainly no theologian, neither am I a follower of any particular religion, which in my opinion is a good thing. It is probably also the major reason why I can actually see some good in most religions. As the Dalai Lama rightly points out… “If you have a particular faith or religion that is good – but you can survive without it.”

He also said; “All major religious traditions carry basically the same message, that is love, compassion and forgiveness… the important thing is they should be part of our daily lives.” The sad question is realistically; how often does that actually happen? Yes some religious followers are visibly more devote than others however; how many truly believe what it is they are following? How many do what they do out of tradition or even peer pressure? How many actually think deeply about what they espouse?

Having some passion, about many aspects of your life, is a good thing. It’s not good when that passion is extreme or impacts upon others and becomes bigotry or worse, sectarian violence. I can accept and respect anyone’s personal beliefs, I’m even happy for them to tell me about them, especially if they can do it in an educated and friendly fashion. I’m constantly annoyed with our media though, why do they constantly turn out rafts of perverse drivel about religious division in our society? Have they got some hidden agenda to create division? And if so, to what end?

Other people’s beliefs, culture and history have always been an important part of why I love to travel. I find the culture of others interesting. I like to try to understand what makes people tick. It’s one of the ways in which I can learn, it’s how I educate myself about our world and the Peoples who live in it. What I abhor is those who inadequately and unintelligently expect me to believe in what they believe…woe betide those who come knocking at my front door pedalling their particular brand of legend and myth!

I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” – Mahatma Gandhi

Mahatma Gandhi told us that “mankind is naught but a single nation” and that “God has no religion” so; why is there so much conflict in our world, often dressed up in a colourful cloak of religious belief? Just because you were ‘saved’ by your particular ‘god’ it doesn’t follow that I need to be ‘saved’ too! Perhaps I am strong enough to be sufficiently satisfied with my lot? It never ceases to amaze me how so many religions seem to try to coral their followers with fear; to threaten them with hell and damnation if they don’t follow, market, worship and pray in a manner prescribed in some ancient dusty book?

The church is always trying to get other people to reform; it might not be a bad idea to reform itself a little, by way of example – Mark Twain

I think Georgia Harkness eloquently summed up much of what is wrong about religions. Harkness was an American Christian theologian and Methodist, she observed; “The tendency to turn human judgments into divine commands makes religion one of the most dangerous forces in the world.” It seems to me that many religious beliefs, and sadly the sectarian violence that can (and does) develop, stems from little more than individual power (and/or wealth) struggles born of human tribalism. Thought process which in turn bread and reinforce hatred? Levels of hate and extremism which come from a lack of respect for others, a lack of understanding and fear that serves to develop contempt and paranoia.

Hatred paralyses life; love releases it. Hatred confuses life; love harmonizes it. Hatred darkens life; love illuminates it – Martin Luther King Jr

Perhaps the prominence of neoliberalism and overt political correctness in today’s society has had an impact here? The pejorative and pervasive nature of PC policies and process has served to stifle and/or control our thoughts, never mind our words. But, as Martin Luther King Jr pointed out; “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” If we can’t talk about what and why we believe what we do, where is our hope for future understanding?

It is interesting that so many of the world’s great leaders, now revered by many as humanitarian visionaries, were people who came to prominence through religious and/or politically derived social struggles of humanity. The sad thing is, in many respects, we have failed to learn from those struggles. Albert Einstein provided a useful and sensible viewpoint here; “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow” – without that ‘hope’ (for humanity) we have nothing. Learning provides us with the personal tools to develop a capability to do things differently. The problem is too often; we tend not to adjust our actions or direction of thought based upon what we have learned.

We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” – Albert Einstein

To change things we have to observe, think and talk about them but unfortunately, many of us have a tendency to do none of that. We are happy to accept the status quo, to blindly follow the beliefs of our peers, often with gay abandon. That is the way it has always been and always will be, for ever and ever etc. But, without change we are destined to remain in our dark ages.

We must become the change we want to see. – Mahatma Gandhi

Another one of Gandhi’s much trotted out quotes was; what do I think of Western civilisation? I think it would be a very good idea” but what has actually changed since he said that? A great deal is the simple answer however; not all of that change has been for the better. We seem to be in a period of social and religious regression. Despite the fact our society is (supposedly) far more inclusive and secular than was once the case in our recent history.

We now have a society built by the wealthy, designed and controlled to meet the needs and desires of the rich and powerful and mostly, on the foundations of the poor and disadvantaged. We can celebrate individualism but often, only when it relates to the wealth, ‘celebrity’ status and outward appearance of the ‘beautiful’ people. Is that really the kind of ‘civilisation’ and social progression we want to see? I would hope that the majority would agree with me here with an emphatic ‘no’ answer however; we’re returning to a point where we lack tolerance; social, racial or religious. Despite ‘tolerance’ being the ethos we say we possess, live by and once stringently worked to enforce and develop.

In my lifetime we have seen the (apparent) progression of civil rights in the USA, the (apparent) end of apartheid in South Africa, the (apparent) end of the Yugoslav wars and, a little nearer to home, the (apparent) end of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland. I say ‘apparent’ in all of the above because; there are still too many elements of the original intolerance issues still bubbling under the surface of our new world. One of the biggest threats to our society (and world peace) is that lack of tolerance. We started to build on those foundations of tolerance and understanding but (in many respects), perhaps we’ve lost sight of (or forget) what we were trying to build?

We need to urgently revisit or reinvent our human skills of tolerant communication and non-judgemental understanding, especially around the issues of our personal beliefs and religion!

I’m prepared to listen to anyone about their background and culture, preferably from the individual and not the newspapers or TV however; I’d prefer to sit on a river bank, to watch and be grateful for our world and all the wondrous things that it contains. To ponder on ‘the meaning of life’ and contemplate why people do and say the things they do. I can be at peace with myself, marvelling in the simple and bounteous beauty of our natural world however; if anyone wants to donate a copy of their sacred scriptures, I’m sure it will provide a useful source of fuel for my campfire!


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,249 other followers